Spotlight November 2021: Safe Materials from Scratch – Safe-by-Design in Materials Research

Home > Spotlight November 2021: Safe Materials from Scratch – Safe-by-Design in Materials Research

Advances in the field of materials science continue to amaze us with nanoscale materials with extraordinary chemical, electrical, optical, and numerous other properties. However, some nanoscale materials have different toxicological profiles compared to the same bulk material. Since safety issues are usually addressed just before launching a product into the market, safety issues may be discovered too late, thus resulting in a lot of wasted effort. This month we want to highlight a two-part research paper. This paper proposes a Safe-by-Design (SbD) strategy to link materials functionality with environmental and human safety allowing innovators to anticipate potential safety issues in the early stages of the innovation process. Therefore, unleashing the full economic potential of innovative nanoscale materials.

The SbD strategy aims to reduce uncertainties in materials research and development and, at the same time, raise human and environmental safety. The proposed strategy ensures the collection of safety-related data throughout the whole development process complying with regulatory requirements and ensuring a transparent communication of risks from early in the innovation process onwards. The authors adapt the Cooper’s stage-gate-model – a project management technique usually used for product development – by including new decisive parameters for the decision-making during the innovation process. Moreover, the authors offer a comprehensive overview of the information needed to balance safety and functionality and illustrate the applicability of the SbD strategy using a case study: Carbon nanotube-based transparent conductive films. Whereas the second part of the paper concentrates on the applicability of SbD, the first part offers a set of questions to identify which type of information is required to assess and reduce environmental and human risks. These questions allow innovators to find, prioritize, and choose safer alternatives.

 

Original publications:

Tavernaro, I., Dekkers, S., Soeteman-Hernández, L. G., Herbeck-Engel, P., Noorlander, C., and Kraegeloh, A. 2021. Safe-by-design part II: a strategy for balancing safety and functionality in the different stages of the innovation process. NanoImpact, 24, 100354. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100354

Dekkers, S., Wijnhoven, S. W., Braakhuis, H. M., Soeteman-Hernandez, L. G., Sips, A. J., Tavernaro, I., Kraegeloh, A., and Noorlander, C. W. 2020. Safe-by-Design part I: Proposal for nanospecific human health safety aspects needed along the innovation process. NanoImpact, 18, 100227. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100227

Spotlight November 2021: Safe Materials from Scratch – Safe-by-Design in Materials Research

Weitere Spotlights


Spotlight October 2021: Nanopesticides – a proposal for a risk assessment framework

Spotlight October 2021: Nanopesticides – a proposal for a risk assessment framework

The application of so-called “nanopesticides” (see also cross-sectional text Nanomaterials in plant protection products) is said to have two basic advantages: a smaller amount of pesticide is needed for the same agricultural area and the efficacy is improved. This is necessary to grow enough food for a still growing world population. However, this could also […]

Read more

Spotlight May 2022: Nano-ghosts” – Risk assessment of submicron-sized particles in food biased towards fictional “nano”

Spotlight May 2022: Nano-ghosts” – Risk assessment of submicron-sized particles in food biased towards fictional “nano”

The European Commission has issued a ban on the colorant titanium dioxide in food. Titanium dioxide, which provides a nice shine and bright white color, can potentially damage genetic material. We chose a review article from 2022 for the May 2022 Spotlight that addresses the risk assessment of food-grade titanium dioxide (E171) and the resulting […]

Read more

Spotlight February 2021: Nanoobjects in the COVID-vaccine – scientifically correct?

Spotlight February 2021: Nanoobjects in the COVID-vaccine – scientifically correct?

The COVID-19 pandemic induces very different reactions of people on the internet (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7002e1.htm) and in the social networks. Without following the conspiracy theories as “5G nanochip hidden in COVID vaccines” some news as “COVID vaccines induce allergic reactions” should be scientifically recognised. The picture from the 5G-nanochip whose plan goes viral on the internet is […]

Read more

Spotlight November 2020: Nanotechnology in the public perception

Spotlight November 2020: Nanotechnology in the public perception

In November, we would like to draw your attention to a publication that examines public perception of the safety of nanomaterials in Austria.It shows, that although there is generally a rather positive attitude towards nanomaterials, there are different opinions on safety issues from different social groups. Further clarification seems necessary. Despite the widespread use of […]

Read more

Skip to content