
The application of so-called “nanopesticides” (see also cross-sectional text Nanomaterials in plant protection products) is said to have two basic advantages: a smaller amount of pesticide is needed for the same agricultural area and the efficacy is improved. This is necessary to grow enough food for a still growing world population. However, this could also entail increased risks for humans and the environment if, for example, these substances could be absorbed significantly better by crops, thus increasing their concentration in food, and/or that they could be absorbed better by humans or livestock, thus contributing to increased body burden.
To this end, an international group of scientists has considered and established a tiered approach to assess the risks to human health (Kah et al., 2021). Taking into account existing guidance documents and regulations (e.g., OECD guidelines), a strategy was developed on how a sustainable use of new nanopesticides could be enabled while considering safety-related issues. Two general principles were distinguished: first, the possibility of using nanoscale packages to deliver the active ingredients (so-called “nanocarriers”), and second, nanometer-sized active agent, such as metals or metal oxides that deliver active ions (e.g., silver or copper), with the nanoparticles usually delivered by protective sheaths made of polymers. For both variants, the critical steps for potential human exposure were identified (active ingredient preparation, field application, and postharvest exposure through food ingestion) and ways to investigate possible toxic effects that may be triggered.
The model shown here consists of 6 steps necessary to holistically describe nanopesticides and their health effects. In addition, the group further highlights important knowledge gaps that should be addressed in the near future.
Original publication:
Kah, M., Johnston, L.J., Kookana, R.S., Bruce, W., Haase, A., Ritz, V., Dinglasan, J., Doak, S., Garelick, H., and Gubala, V. (2021). Comprehensive framework for human health risk assessment of nanopesticides. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 955-964

Weitere Spotlights
Spotlight April 2021: Nanomaterials and Fake News – a commentary based on an example
In February 2021, the article “The invisible killer lurking in our consumer products” appeared, describing nanoparticles as a greater danger than Corona [1]. “The use of nanomaterials” would be “unregulated” and “nanomaterials are so small that they cannot be determined once they are part of a product”. So what is the truth of these statements? […]
Read moreSpotlight January 2022: Methods, models, mechanisms and metadata
For the new year, we are presenting no “classic” paper here, but would like to point out an editorial: Methods, Models, Mechanisms and Metadata: Introduction to the Nanotoxicology Collection at F1000 Research. This editorial introduces the F1000Research Nanotoxicology Collection, where best practices can be collected in the form of original research reports, including no-effect studies, […]
Read moreSpotlight March 2023: How can photovoltaics be made safe and sustainable?
Conventional photovoltaic systems often have only low efficiency, i.e. only a fraction of the solar energy is converted into electrical energy and made usable. For this reason, research is being conducted into innovative materials that can significantly increase the energy yield and thus also enable more electrical energy to be generated from renewable sources. However, […]
Read moreSpotlight May 2022: Nano-ghosts” – Risk assessment of submicron-sized particles in food biased towards fictional “nano”
The European Commission has issued a ban on the colorant titanium dioxide in food. Titanium dioxide, which provides a nice shine and bright white color, can potentially damage genetic material. We chose a review article from 2022 for the May 2022 Spotlight that addresses the risk assessment of food-grade titanium dioxide (E171) and the resulting […]
Read more