The application of so-called “nanopesticides” (see also cross-sectional text Nanomaterials in plant protection products) is said to have two basic advantages: a smaller amount of pesticide is needed for the same agricultural area and the efficacy is improved. This is necessary to grow enough food for a still growing world population. However, this could also entail increased risks for humans and the environment if, for example, these substances could be absorbed significantly better by crops, thus increasing their concentration in food, and/or that they could be absorbed better by humans or livestock, thus contributing to increased body burden.
To this end, an international group of scientists has considered and established a tiered approach to assess the risks to human health (Kah et al., 2021). Taking into account existing guidance documents and regulations (e.g., OECD guidelines), a strategy was developed on how a sustainable use of new nanopesticides could be enabled while considering safety-related issues. Two general principles were distinguished: first, the possibility of using nanoscale packages to deliver the active ingredients (so-called “nanocarriers”), and second, nanometer-sized active agent, such as metals or metal oxides that deliver active ions (e.g., silver or copper), with the nanoparticles usually delivered by protective sheaths made of polymers. For both variants, the critical steps for potential human exposure were identified (active ingredient preparation, field application, and postharvest exposure through food ingestion) and ways to investigate possible toxic effects that may be triggered.
The model shown here consists of 6 steps necessary to holistically describe nanopesticides and their health effects. In addition, the group further highlights important knowledge gaps that should be addressed in the near future.
Kah, M., Johnston, L.J., Kookana, R.S., Bruce, W., Haase, A., Ritz, V., Dinglasan, J., Doak, S., Garelick, H., and Gubala, V. (2021). Comprehensive framework for human health risk assessment of nanopesticides. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 955-964
Spotlight November 2020: Nanotechnology in the public perception
In November, we would like to draw your attention to a publication that examines public perception of the safety of nanomaterials in Austria.It shows, that although there is generally a rather positive attitude towards nanomaterials, there are different opinions on safety issues from different social groups. Further clarification seems necessary. Despite the widespread use of […]Read more
Spotlight September 2020: Groundwater remediation with Carbo-Iron® – Risk or Benefit?
In September we would like to present a paper of the BMBF project Fe-Nanosit. The project dealt with the use of iron-containing nanomaterials in groundwater and wastewater remediation. A comprehensive assessment and weighing of benefits and possible environmental risks resulting from the application is now presented by the project partners in this paper. Groundwater is indispensable for the […]Read more
Spotlight February 2021: Nanoobjects in the COVID-vaccine – scientifically correct?
The COVID-19 pandemic induces very different reactions of people on the internet (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7002e1.htm) and in the social networks. Without following the conspiracy theories as “5G nanochip hidden in COVID vaccines” some news as “COVID vaccines induce allergic reactions” should be scientifically recognised. The picture from the 5G-nanochip whose plan goes viral on the internet is […]Read more
Spotlight July 2021: The Path to Digital Material Research – It is never too late to start
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data…. Have you read these words lately? No, these are not just buzzwords. The digitalisation of science is an evolving topic that is gaining importance with each passing day. That is why this month we would like to introduce you to the article “Digital Transformation in Materials Science: A Paradigm […]Read more