
The application of so-called “nanopesticides” (see also cross-sectional text Nanomaterials in plant protection products) is said to have two basic advantages: a smaller amount of pesticide is needed for the same agricultural area and the efficacy is improved. This is necessary to grow enough food for a still growing world population. However, this could also entail increased risks for humans and the environment if, for example, these substances could be absorbed significantly better by crops, thus increasing their concentration in food, and/or that they could be absorbed better by humans or livestock, thus contributing to increased body burden.
To this end, an international group of scientists has considered and established a tiered approach to assess the risks to human health (Kah et al., 2021). Taking into account existing guidance documents and regulations (e.g., OECD guidelines), a strategy was developed on how a sustainable use of new nanopesticides could be enabled while considering safety-related issues. Two general principles were distinguished: first, the possibility of using nanoscale packages to deliver the active ingredients (so-called “nanocarriers”), and second, nanometer-sized active agent, such as metals or metal oxides that deliver active ions (e.g., silver or copper), with the nanoparticles usually delivered by protective sheaths made of polymers. For both variants, the critical steps for potential human exposure were identified (active ingredient preparation, field application, and postharvest exposure through food ingestion) and ways to investigate possible toxic effects that may be triggered.
The model shown here consists of 6 steps necessary to holistically describe nanopesticides and their health effects. In addition, the group further highlights important knowledge gaps that should be addressed in the near future.
Original publication:
Kah, M., Johnston, L.J., Kookana, R.S., Bruce, W., Haase, A., Ritz, V., Dinglasan, J., Doak, S., Garelick, H., and Gubala, V. (2021). Comprehensive framework for human health risk assessment of nanopesticides. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 955-964

Weitere Spotlights
Spotlight July: Plastic Pollution and the Urgent Need for Comprehensive Action
Plastic pollution has become a significant threat to the oceans, biodiversity, and ecosystems worldwide. Despite efforts to reduce plastic consumption, escalating plastic production continues to increase the magnitude of plastic pollution in the environment. In response to this crisis, the UN-Environmental Assembly (Link) adopted a resolution in March 2022 to develop a legally binding treaty […]
Read moreSpotlight December 2020: Rethinking Nanosafety – Part II
In December we would like to draw attention to the special issue: Rethinking Nanosafety – Part II in small. In the July Spotlight we already presented Part I. This special issue “Rethinking Nanosafety – Part II” also features research papers by renowned scientists in the field of nanosafety research. The first part of this special […]
Read moreSpotlight March 2021: Is Nanotechnology the Swiss Army Knife against Future Pandemics?
The COVID 19 outbreak has led to a fundamental rethinking of existing approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention methods. The need for better and more efficient concepts is global and urgent. Nanotechnology has long been at the forefront of innovation and has led to advances in many different disciplines. Could this interdisciplinary field help develop […]
Read moreSpotlight April 2021: Nanomaterials and Fake News – a commentary based on an example
In February 2021, the article “The invisible killer lurking in our consumer products” appeared, describing nanoparticles as a greater danger than Corona [1]. “The use of nanomaterials” would be “unregulated” and “nanomaterials are so small that they cannot be determined once they are part of a product”. So what is the truth of these statements? […]
Read more